在全球人工智慧浪潮席捲世界的今天，英偉達（NVIDIA）創辦人黃仁勳，早已不只是一位成功的企業家，更成為科技創新、企業領導與時代變革的重要象徵。

然而，當一位站在世界科技頂峰的人物陷入爭議，社會究竟應該如何評價他的功過？我們又該如何在個人聲譽、企業責任與員工情感之間，尋找一個公平而理性的答案？

近日，有關黃仁勳去留的消息引發討論。尤其是傳出有一千六百位英偉達員工聯名，希望他繼續留任，更使這場風波增添了令人糾結的人情與企業治理問題。

這不僅是一個人的去留問題，更是一個值得我們深思的時代課題。

一、從科技英雄到爭議人物

黃仁勳自1993年創立英偉達以來，帶領公司從圖形晶片製造商，成長為全球人工智慧產業的重要推動力量。

然而，英偉達於11月12日正式宣布，黃仁勳辭去執行長、總裁及董事職務，由財務長Colette Kress暫代執行長。

一位曾經創造企業奇蹟的領導人，竟然在事業高峰之際離開自己一手創立的公司，怎能不令人感慨？

二、一千六百則留言背後的情感

根據《WIRED》11月12日報導，英偉達內部一篇呼籲董事會重視員工意見的文章，已經收到超過一千六百則留言，其中多數支持黃仁勳重新出任執行長。

必須說明的是，目前證實的是超過一千六百則留言，而不是一千六百位員工正式簽署聯名信。

WIRED+1

這些留言傳達出一個重要訊息：在許多員工心中，黃仁勳不只是一位企業主管，更是一位帶領他們共同奮鬥、創造歷史的領導者。

他們記得的，不只是今天的爭議，更是過去三十多年一起走過的艱難歲月。

這份情感，值得社會傾聽。

三、功績與錯誤，應該如何衡量？

任何人都不應因為事業成功而享有不受約束的特權。

同樣地，一個人多年來對科技、企業及社會所作出的貢獻，也不應因為個人爭議而被全盤抹去。

黃仁勳已公開承認婚姻上的不忠，並向家人道歉。至於其他涉及公司治理及國家安全的問題，仍應依據事實、調查與適當程序作出判斷。

NVIDIA Newsroom+1

我們必須區分個人的道德責任、企業領導責任，以及可能涉及法律的問題。

這三者彼此相關，卻不能完全混為一談。

四、英偉達的未來，考驗企業治理智慧

英偉達已不只是一家普通的科技公司。它的發展牽動人工智慧、全球資本市場，以及無數企業的科技投資。

因此，黃仁勳是否重返公司領導職位，不應只取決於支持者的熱情，也不能僅憑輿論壓力作出決定。

董事會必須尊重員工的聲音，同時維護公司制度、股東利益與社會信任。

真正成熟的企業治理，不是忽略人的情感，而是在情感與責任之間找到平衡。

五、給一位創業者重新出發的機會

身為長期從事新聞、金融與企業經營的創業者，我深深了解，創立一家公司需要多少勇氣、堅持與犧牲。

企業的成功，從來不是一朝一夕。

一個人能夠帶領團隊三十多年，在無數次競爭與危機中創造世界級企業，這段歷史值得尊重。

但是，尊重成就，不代表免除責任。

給予重新出發的機會，也不代表忽略受到傷害的人。

如果相關事實能夠獲得充分釐清，責任得到適當承擔，那麼社會是否也應保留讓一個人重新貢獻才華的空間？

這是一個值得我們認真思考的問題。

六、令人糾結的，不只是黃仁勳

今天，真正令人糾結的黃仁勳現象，是我們如何看待一位曾經創造巨大成就、卻也犯下錯誤的人。

我們是否能夠既堅持原則，又保有人性的寬容？

是否能夠既追求責任，又不否定一個人一生的努力？

黃仁勳的未來，最終仍須由事實、制度及他自己的選擇來決定。

但是，這場風波留給世界的問題，遠遠超過一家公司的執行長去留。

我們可以要求一個人為錯誤負責，也可以承認他曾經為世界帶來的貢獻。

我們不應讓成功成為逃避責任的理由，也不應讓一次人生風暴，成為否定所有成就的唯一標準。

這或許就是黃仁勳現象最令人糾結，也最值得深思的地方。

The Troubling Jensen Huang Phenomenon

November 14, 2026 | Saturday

By Wea H. Lee

Founder, Southern News Group

Chairman, International Trade Center

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang sells shares worth $42 million under the same rule that also sees Google and Microsoft CEOs sell their shares - The Times of India

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

1. From Technology Icon to a Moment of Crisis

In an era when artificial intelligence is transforming the world, Jensen Huang, the founder of NVIDIA, has become far more than a successful businessman. He represents technological innovation, entrepreneurial determination, and the extraordinary possibilities of the modern digital revolution.

Since founding NVIDIA in 1993, Huang has helped transform a graphics-chip company into one of the most influential forces in artificial intelligence.

Yet today, his leadership and personal reputation have become subjects of intense public discussion.

Reports concerning his departure from NVIDIA have raised difficult questions about personal responsibility, corporate leadership, and the future of a company he spent more than three decades building.

The reported response of approximately 1,600 employees and their expressions of support for Huang have added another emotional dimension to this controversy.

The precise number of employees who formally signed a petition has not been independently verified.

This is no longer simply a question about one executive's future. It is a reflection of the complicated relationship between human achievement, personal mistakes, loyalty, and accountability.

2. The Human Emotions Behind 1,600 Voices

Behind the reported expressions of support lies something deeper than corporate politics.

For many NVIDIA employees, Jensen Huang is not merely a chief executive. He is the founder who guided their company through uncertainty, competition, technological breakthroughs, and extraordinary growth.

They remember the difficult years, the long working hours, the sacrifices, and the shared dreams that eventually helped transform NVIDIA into a global technology leader.

Their loyalty deserves to be heard.

A company is not built by financial capital alone. It is built through trust, relationships, shared purpose, and the belief that people are working together toward something meaningful.

The voices of employees remind us that leadership is not measured only by stock prices or quarterly earnings. It is also measured by the human connections developed over many years.

3. How Should We Judge Great Achievements and Personal Failures?

No individual, regardless of wealth, influence, or accomplishments, should be above accountability.

At the same time, the contributions of a person who has spent decades building an extraordinary enterprise should not automatically be erased by controversy.

We must distinguish between personal moral responsibility, corporate governance, and legal accountability.

These matters may be related, but they are not identical.

A fair society must be capable of recognizing achievement while demanding responsibility.

We should neither excuse wrongdoing because someone is successful nor disregard an entire lifetime of accomplishment because of a single chapter in that person's life.

The challenge is to find justice without abandoning compassion.

4. NVIDIA's Future Is Bigger Than One Individual

NVIDIA is no longer simply a technology company.

Its products and innovations influence artificial intelligence, scientific research, global investment, and the economic strategies of nations.

Therefore, decisions concerning its leadership must be guided by responsible corporate governance, transparency, and the long-term interests of employees, shareholders, and society.

Employee loyalty is important, but it cannot replace the responsibilities of a board of directors.

Likewise, public controversy should not become a substitute for a fair and thorough examination of the facts.

Strong institutions must be capable of balancing human considerations with professional judgment.

That balance will help determine the future of NVIDIA.

5. Should a Great Entrepreneur Be Given Another Opportunity?

As someone who has spent much of my life building businesses in journalism, finance, and international trade, I understand how difficult it is to create an enterprise from almost nothing.

Every successful company represents years of determination, uncertainty, sacrifice, and perseverance.

Jensen Huang's contributions to the development of modern computing and artificial intelligence are undeniable.

His achievements have influenced industries around the world and inspired countless entrepreneurs.

But admiration for achievement must never become an excuse to ignore responsibility.

The more difficult question is whether a person who acknowledges mistakes, accepts appropriate consequences, and demonstrates a genuine commitment to change should be allowed another opportunity to contribute.

I believe this is a question every civilized society must be willing to consider.

Accountability and forgiveness do not have to be enemies.

6. The Real Meaning of the Jensen Huang Phenomenon

What makes the Jensen Huang phenomenon so troubling is not simply the future of one famous entrepreneur.

It is the larger question of how society should judge individuals whose extraordinary accomplishments coexist with human imperfections.

Can we defend moral principles while preserving compassion?

Can we demand accountability without destroying the possibility of redemption?

Can we recognize the contributions of a lifetime without overlooking personal failures?

These are not easy questions.

The reported support from NVIDIA employees suggests that many people continue to see value in Huang's leadership and legacy.

Their sentiments deserve consideration, even as the company and the public examine the circumstances surrounding the controversy.

Ultimately, Jensen Huang's future should be determined by facts, responsible governance, and his own decisions.

But the lessons of this moment extend far beyond Silicon Valley.

We must never allow success to become a shield against accountability. Yet we should never allow controversy alone to erase a lifetime of extraordinary achievement.

A truly mature society must have the wisdom to distinguish between justice and vengeance, between accountability and condemnation, and between human weakness and enduring contribution.

Perhaps that is why the Jensen Huang phenomenon is so deeply troubling.

It reminds us that even the most successful people remain human.

And it challenges us to ask whether our society still possesses the compassion, fairness, and wisdom to recognize both greatness and imperfection.

History should remember not only how high a person has risen, but also how fairly we judge that person when the storms of life arrive.